We have Romney who disingenuously said that spending Taxpayer money on FEMA is "immoral."
I say that is disingenuous because Romney wants to actually take Taxpayer FEMA money and give it to states or "even better" give it to Private Sector.
Therefore, the Taxpayer would have still paid the same amount of Taxes for a "FEMA" only Romney's pals in the Private Sector would get our money.
Last night, Romney supporter, Rep Steve King (R-IA), during a debate said that he would not support FEMA money going to states unless there were strings attached.
From MSNBC:
As millions survey the damage from Hurricane Sandy, the Iowa congressman is already worried about what victims will do with the federal aid they haven't received yet. "I want them to get the resources that are necessary," he said Tuesday night during a debate. "But they need to come with a plan on how to spend it, because [after Hurricane Katrina] they spent it on Gucci bags and massage parlors."
King was one of only 11 members of Congress who opposed a 2005 bill to help those affected by Katrina. King's opponent, Christie Vilsack, called his comments "heartless."